プライム無料体験をお試しいただけます
プライム無料体験で、この注文から無料配送特典をご利用いただけます。
非会員 | プライム会員 | |
---|---|---|
通常配送 | ¥410 - ¥450* | 無料 |
お急ぎ便 | ¥510 - ¥550 | |
お届け日時指定便 | ¥510 - ¥650 |
*Amazon.co.jp発送商品の注文額 ¥3,500以上は非会員も無料
無料体験はいつでもキャンセルできます。30日のプライム無料体験をぜひお試しください。
¥10,273¥10,273 税込
発送元: Amazon.co.jp 販売者: Amazon.co.jp
¥10,273¥10,273 税込
発送元: Amazon.co.jp
販売者: Amazon.co.jp
¥2,909¥2,909 税込
ポイント: 29pt
(1%)
配送料 ¥430 6月4日-16日にお届け
発送元: worldbooksjapan 販売者: worldbooksjapan
¥2,909¥2,909 税込
ポイント: 29pt
(1%)
配送料 ¥430 6月4日-16日にお届け
発送元: worldbooksjapan
販売者: worldbooksjapan
無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。
ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。
携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。
何か問題が発生しました。後で再度リクエストしてください。
OK
Truth (Oxford Readings in Philosophy) ペーパーバック – 1999/10/7
英語版
Simon Blackburn
(編集),
Keith Simmons
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"¥10,273","priceAmount":10273.00,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"10,273","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"WhzVv3LR0He%2FxDRxumNo%2B8WhwkLdWOwienmd3RUvzMTrSg5KgypLtyvI28lYCsttC%2B5EtLU4mr3U7vO4NXXZ%2FYjr5wcqsRJGmhzOP7ivOONaCHN1w9TD6lRlymis1H1I","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"¥2,909","priceAmount":2909.00,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"2,909","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"WhzVv3LR0He%2FxDRxumNo%2B8WhwkLdWOwicC6orZfEmLZD6Q%2F1dHsGxyTtWPDslHtyOKOhVm0Cvcw2WMli%2F43KyNMtAdSiqKf%2BfFk0l2iybtOkVqLeORAahwaYFiDQntE4YrUNV8IXn9LldtH54%2FdocCvG6Ctc0rjaoQ7RB2VP6hAGUxlVtveeQw%3D%3D","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}
購入オプションとあわせ買い
This volume is designed to set out some of the central issues in the theory of truth. It draws together, for the first time, the debates between philosophers who favor 'robust' or 'substantive' theories of truth, and those other, 'deflationist' or minimalists, who deny that such theories can be given. The editors provide a substantial introduction, in which they look at how the debates relate to further issues, such as the Liar paradox and formal truth theories.
- 本の長さ416ページ
- 言語英語
- 出版社Oxford University Press
- 発売日1999/10/7
- 寸法13.34 x 1.91 x 19.69 cm
- ISBN-100198752504
- ISBN-13978-0198752509
この著者の人気タイトル
ページ 1 以下のうち 1 最初から観るページ 1 以下のうち 1
商品の説明
著者について
Simon Blackburn is Edna S. Koury Distinguished Professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. His publications include Spreading the Word (OUP, 1984), The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (OUP, 1994), and Ruling Passions (OUP, 1998).
Keith Simmons is Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is author of Universality and the Liar: An Essay on Truth and the Diagonal Argument (CUP, 1993).
Keith Simmons is Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is author of Universality and the Liar: An Essay on Truth and the Diagonal Argument (CUP, 1993).
登録情報
- 出版社 : Oxford University Press (1999/10/7)
- 発売日 : 1999/10/7
- 言語 : 英語
- ペーパーバック : 416ページ
- ISBN-10 : 0198752504
- ISBN-13 : 978-0198752509
- 寸法 : 13.34 x 1.91 x 19.69 cm
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 758,920位洋書 (洋書の売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 1,489位Philosophical Logic & Language
- - 1,796位Epistemology Philosophy
- - 1,844位Epistemology
- カスタマーレビュー:
著者について
著者をフォローして、新作のアップデートや改善されたおすすめを入手してください。
著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
他の国からのトップレビュー
kc
5つ星のうち5.0
Fascinating and thought provoking
2023年12月10日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
My son is reading this pre A level philosophy and religion. He's really enjoying the book, which is a full-on philosophical work. Helped immensely in getting a place at an exclusive college when asked about his choice of A level in an interview.
Francis O Walker
5つ星のうち5.0
Uncommon sense
2018年8月12日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
If you are interested in the question of what and how we know, you will find in Simon Blackburn's treatise a good and thoughtful discussion. It is written to be learned from, to paraphrase Goethe, not to simply demonstrate what the author knows. It reviews different approaches to the question, the strengths and weaknesses of each, and speaks to those of us in the real world, who both in their professional and personal lives, deal with a series of unknowns, some of which involve discoverable truths of varying degrees of complexity, some of which are not worth the effort, and some of which cannot or perhaps never, be resolved. The book presents concepts that are readily assimilated, and their validation, corroboration, and verification are left to the reader. Open ended, informative, and practical it a good companion to his previous work (and that of Harry Frankfurt) and well worth the read.
boris
5つ星のうち3.0
A little bit disappointed
2019年5月6日にドイツでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
After having read some highest-level reviews of the book, I was a little bit disappointed. The author is a radical opponent of relativism and postmodernism. Also am I, and therefore, I expected to find the book very sympathetical. And indeed, the book is not bad, but I found some arguments much too light. For a post-modernist partisan it would not be a big problem to rebut them. At least at several sites it appeared to me that the author does not conceive of the fact that any knowledge can only be on a way to truth, and therefore, it is always based on some assumptions whose truth content remains unknown. For these reason, we have to make not only decisions but also judgments in Hannah Arendt's sense (see "Responsibility and Judgment", NY, Schocken Books).
An example. The author critisizes William James (whom he erroneously counts as relativist) for the opinion that leaps of belief "give us the blessings of real knowledge". The authors argues: "How can this be so? Suppose, for instance, it occurs to you that the oak tree in your garden might contain the spirit of Napoleon... Now how does 'real knowledge' get into the picture?" To see how cheap the argument is, we can compare it with a parallel case: it occurs to you that the oak tree that you see in your garden is not the spirit of Napoleon but - an oak tree! The whole psychology of perception demonstrates us that what we SEE as an oak tree might well be something else. Does, nevertheless, "real knowledge" get into your perceptual image of the oak tree? The case shows that a leap of belief (e.g., the belief that you are not experienceing an illusion) is, fully in accordance with James, necessary to get from an impression of an oak tree to an action directed at this object.
Nevertheless, I find the book in general quite useful, particularly for people like me, i.e. theorists who work close to philosophical problems but do not have a systematic philosophical background. It presents, in a good language, a large overview on many highly interestings discussions to the topic of truth, which took place in the history of philosophy. However, novices can be in jeopardy, because they can first be impressed by the author's arguments against relativistic ideas, but later, when they meet strong postmodernistic counterarguments they may rapidly change their view.
An example. The author critisizes William James (whom he erroneously counts as relativist) for the opinion that leaps of belief "give us the blessings of real knowledge". The authors argues: "How can this be so? Suppose, for instance, it occurs to you that the oak tree in your garden might contain the spirit of Napoleon... Now how does 'real knowledge' get into the picture?" To see how cheap the argument is, we can compare it with a parallel case: it occurs to you that the oak tree that you see in your garden is not the spirit of Napoleon but - an oak tree! The whole psychology of perception demonstrates us that what we SEE as an oak tree might well be something else. Does, nevertheless, "real knowledge" get into your perceptual image of the oak tree? The case shows that a leap of belief (e.g., the belief that you are not experienceing an illusion) is, fully in accordance with James, necessary to get from an impression of an oak tree to an action directed at this object.
Nevertheless, I find the book in general quite useful, particularly for people like me, i.e. theorists who work close to philosophical problems but do not have a systematic philosophical background. It presents, in a good language, a large overview on many highly interestings discussions to the topic of truth, which took place in the history of philosophy. However, novices can be in jeopardy, because they can first be impressed by the author's arguments against relativistic ideas, but later, when they meet strong postmodernistic counterarguments they may rapidly change their view.
Matryoshka
5つ星のうち5.0
This is a very good primer on the concept of truth in analytic philosophy
2017年4月27日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
This is a very good primer on the concept of truth in analytic philosophy. I had to read it in college for an upper-level logic course, and I still remember this edition well. Well-selected and well-arranged, these readings form a rich conversation about key theories of truth in contemporary philosophy. Each of the selections benefits from being put in this context.
DJS
5つ星のうち4.0
Beautifully written and in a sense easy to read
2018年4月8日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Beautifully written and in a sense easy to read. However the concepts can be quite slippery to grasp if you are not already familiar with this sort of material. It can get rather rarefied at some points, requiring a lot of rereading for the non-expert. In fact the writing is so nice that the experience can be a bit of a rollercoaster ride pitching the reader suddenly from perfectly smooth clarity into rough seas. To be honest the subtitle “a guide for the perplexed” ought to be taken with a pinch of salt because a dummies’ guide/made simple/“101” this is not. I suppose that's what Philosophy is all about though, the encouragement of thought, which this certainly achieves. It did not quite get to the essence of what I was hoping for but skirted and circled tantalizingly around what I perceive as the central problems. So perhaps slightly frustratingly after reading Truth it still seems hidden beyond an obscuring event horizon. However if you are interested in this sort of thing it is definitely worth reading.