中古品:
¥2,219 税込
配送料 ¥267 5月16日-18日にお届け 配送先: 153-0064
詳細を見る
中古商品: 良い | 詳細
コンディション: 中古商品: 良い
コメント: A173-469  カバー綺麗です。  ◎記載のない帯・月報等の付属品は基本ついておりません。◎原則ゆうメールにて発送します。ご自宅の郵便ポストへの投函になります。日・祭日の配達はお休みです。大型連休を挟む場合は連休明けの配達になります。配達業者の都合や交通事情等の理由で到着予定日より遅れる場合があります。◎店舗と併売の為売り切れる場合があります。◎アマゾンの画像と異なる場合があります。以上ご了承ください。
残り1点 ご注文はお早めに 在庫状況について
Kindleアプリのロゴ画像

無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません

ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。

携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。

KindleアプリをダウンロードするためのQRコード

著者をフォロー

何か問題が発生しました。後で再度リクエストしてください。

The Parallax View (Short Circuits) ハードカバー – 2006/2/17

5つ星のうち4.7 9個の評価

The Parallax View is Slavoj Zizek's most substantial theoretical work to appear in many years; Zizek himself describes it as his magnum opus. Parallax can be defined as the apparent displacement of an object, caused by a change in observational position. Zizek is interested in the "parallax gap" separating two points between which no synthesis or mediation is possible, linked by an "impossible short circuit" of levels that can never meet. From this consideration of parallax, Zizek begins a rehabilitation of dialectical materialism.Modes of parallax can be seen in different domains of today's theory, from the wave-particle duality in quantum physics to the parallax of the unconscious in Freudian psychoanalysis between interpretations of the formation of the unconscious and theories of drives. In The Parallax View, Zizek, with his usual astonishing erudition, focuses on three main modes of parallax: the ontological difference, the ultimate parallax that conditions our very access to reality; the scientific parallax, the irreducible gap between the phenomenal experience of reality and its scientific explanation, which reaches its apogee in today's brain sciences (according to which "nobody is home" in the skull, just stacks of brain meat--a condition Zizek calls "the unbearable lightness of being no one"); and the political parallax, the social antagonism that allows for no common ground. Between his discussions of these three modes, Zizek offers interludes that deal with more specific topics--including an ethical act in a novel by Henry James and anti-anti-Semitism.The Parallax View not only expands Zizek's Lacanian-Hegelian approach to new domains (notably cognitive brain sciences) but also provides the systematic exposition of the conceptual framework that underlies his entire work. Philosophical and theological analysis, detailed readings of literature, cinema, and music coexist with lively anecdotes and obscene jokes.

商品の説明

著者について

Sergei Krikalev is a Cosmonaut who has flown as a flight engineerand mission specialist on the MIR Space Station and joint UnitedStates/Russian Space Shuttle missions. For his flight experiencehe has been awarded the titles of Hero of the Soviet Union, theOrder of Lenin, the French title of L'Officer de la Legion de Honneur,and the new title of Hero of Russia. He was also awarded the NASASpace Flight Medal in 1994 and 1998.

登録情報

  • 出版社 ‏ : ‎ Mit Pr (2006/2/17)
  • 発売日 ‏ : ‎ 2006/2/17
  • 言語 ‏ : ‎ 英語
  • ハードカバー ‏ : ‎ 434ページ
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0262240513
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0262240512
  • 寸法 ‏ : ‎ 16.51 x 3.81 x 24.13 cm
  • カスタマーレビュー:
    5つ星のうち4.7 9個の評価

著者について

著者をフォローして、新作のアップデートや改善されたおすすめを入手してください。
スラヴォイ・ジジェク
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

著者の本をもっと見つけたり、似たような著者を調べたり、おすすめの本を読んだりできます。

カスタマーレビュー

星5つ中4.7つ
9グローバルレーティング

この商品をレビュー

他のお客様にも意見を伝えましょう

上位レビュー、対象国: 日本

  • 2008年7月24日に日本でレビュー済み
    Amazonで購入
    題名自体が柄谷行人のカント論((3) トランスクリティーク -カントとマルクス- (定本 柄谷行人集) Transcritique: On Kant And Marx)を連想させるが*、実際柄谷からの引用もかなり見られる。
    本書が翻訳されれば、国を越えて互いに影響し合うという本来の知のあり方が垣間みられて有益だろう。
    海外崇拝から脱するためにも、本書の邦訳によって日本と欧米との間に見られる今の間違ったパララックスビュー(視差)は解消されるべきだろう。


    『トランスクリティーク』をジジェクが論評した部分は、『思想』2004年8月号に『視差的視点』として翻訳された。同じラカニアンとして共闘を続けるバディウの集合論的政治論への言及とともに、この箇所が本書の核になったことは間違いない。
    4人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
    レポート

他の国からのトップレビュー

すべてのレビューを日本語に翻訳
  • McDonald
    5つ星のうち5.0 An apology for Philosophy (against postmodernist skepticism)
    2009年9月22日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
    Amazonで購入
    It is good to read Zizek writing in a more serious, scholarly mode (not that this book doesn't also contain much of his famous humor). Philosophically, he makes a compelling case as to why the various postmodernist philosophers and theorists have done very little to advance philosophical discourse meaningfully beyond Kant and Hegel. In particular, he argues for a Parallax View of Hegel (and post-Hegelian philosophy): dialectical oppositions are never totally reconciled, there remains a gap, the negativity of thinking apart from being, yet this does not mean we regress backward to Kantian skepticism, nor or we stuck in the 'bad infinity' of postmodernist 'deference' or pious reverence for a mysterious Other. Rather, clarification about this gap, the negativity which causes the parallax of view, is shown by Zizek to be what is required of us (scientists and postmodernists alike) if we are at all interested in reason and enlightenment.
    レポート
  • Ruben A. Sanchez
    5つ星のうち5.0 Very insightful
    2008年2月8日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
    Amazonで購入
    It's a synthesis in Zizek's trajectory, but also it opens his work toward new discussions
  • Utah Jack Squint
    5つ星のうち3.0 Fall into the Gap
    2006年8月24日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
    Amazonで購入
    _The Parallax View_, which the ever-prolific Slavoj Zizek has declared the "magnum opus" of his substantial _oeuvre_, is a generally rewarding, if uneven, work.

    I took from it this: every posited antinomy, opposition or other binarism conceals in itself a more pluriform nature, the terms themselves irreducible to themselves (a challenge to Western thoughts principle of identity: an entity is identical to itself[?]), leaving an irreducible bare difference(the old Derridean stand-by) that remains largely unaccountable but ontologically substantial nonetheless -- a locus of "the Real." Ultimately uncognizable, this difference, which for Zizek is the Lacanian "_object petit a_," opens a parallax gap wherein this difference, though uncognizable, nevertheless serves as a common referent among the actors of any ideological disagreement.

    I found this a compelling thesis, and Zizek, though often given to an over-reliance on rhetorical questions, ellipses, and anacoluthon (this latter tendency perhaps inspired by St. Paul, himself an inveterate employer of anacoluthon, whom Z. frequently discusses in the early portions of _TPV_), is in the main persuasive. (I have to balk, however, at Z.'s frequent recourse to pop-cultural examples -- are overwrought, pandering summer blockbusters like _The Matrix_ and _The Revenge of the Sith_ really so fraught with important theoretical implications?) The real shortcoming of _TPV_, as I see it, comes in the final pages, wherein Z., having explicated his theory, waxes prescriptive, encouraging his readers to embody the "Bartleby-parallax" in order to avoid being caught up in the Hegelian pseudo-negations of counterhegemonic practices. We must be as resistant to the latter in our "preferring-not-to's" as to the hegemonic ills the latter are intended to redress -- "I prefer not to eat factory-farmed, adulterated, GM food; I prefer not to purchase food from an organic farming co-op." Because not to do so and to remain, rather, in the old dialectic of resorting to alternatives to dismaying hegemony, is to remain ensnared in the Foucauldian circuits of power that result in the eternal recursion and reinscription of extant relations. The parallactic Bartleby disrupts the workings of ideological apparatuses by cultivating an inner disposition of refusal until, according to Z., there opens up possibilities that are not determined by the dialectic.

    This is precisely where Z. lost me. I recall Bartleby's fate: blind, starving, homeless, jailed ... eventually dead. And, for all of Z.'s hostility to what he calls "postmodern techno-gnosticism," Bartleby seem an odd exemplar, given the fact that Herman Melville, Bartleby's creator, often mused upon the tenets of Gnosticism (He composed a poem on gnosticism, and _The Confidence Man_, his last published novel, arguably lends itself to a gnostic reading). Z.'s recommendation here seems too close to Baudrillard's injunction to "be silent" in the face of popular media -- essentially to choose a mode of resistance likely futile, all while consoling oneself that futility is inevitable, until from the murky parallax gap of the Real messianically springs, like Athena from the head of Zeus, the possibility of truly efficacious revolution.