プライム無料体験をお試しいただけます
プライム無料体験で、この注文から無料配送特典をご利用いただけます。
非会員 | プライム会員 | |
---|---|---|
通常配送 | ¥410 - ¥450* | 無料 |
お急ぎ便 | ¥510 - ¥550 | |
お届け日時指定便 | ¥510 - ¥650 |
*Amazon.co.jp発送商品の注文額 ¥3,500以上は非会員も無料
無料体験はいつでもキャンセルできます。30日のプライム無料体験をぜひお試しください。
¥7,253¥7,253 税込
発送元: Amazon.co.jp 販売者: Amazon.co.jp
¥2,283¥2,283 税込
配送料 ¥350 5月28日-29日にお届け
発送元: ノースブックセンター(不備・不具合があれば返品・返金対応致します) 販売者: ノースブックセンター(不備・不具合があれば返品・返金対応致します)
無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。
ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。
携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。
OK
History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics (Mit Press) ペーパーバック – 1972/11/15
購入オプションとあわせ買い
Writing in 1968, on the occasion of the appearance of his collected works, Lukács evaluated the influence of this book as follows:
"For the historical effect of History and Class Consciousness and also for the actuality of the present time one problem is of decisive importance: alienation, which is here treated for the first time since Marx as the central question of a revolutionary critique of capitalism, and whose historical as well as methodological origins are deeply rooted in Hegelian dialectic. It goes without saying that the problem was omnipresent. A few years after History and Class Consciousness was published, it was moved into the focus of philosophical discussion by Heidegger in his Being and Time, a place which it maintains to this day largely as a result of the position occupied by Sartre and his followers. The philologic question raised by L. Goldmann, who considered Heidegger's work partly as a polemic reply to my (admittedly unnamed) work, need not be discussed here. It suffices today to say that the problem was in the air, particularly if we analyze its background in detail in order to clarify its effect, the mixture of Marxist and Existentialist thought processes, which prevailed especially in France immediately after the Second World War. In this connection priorities, influences, and so on are not particularly significant. What is important is that the alienation of man was recognized and appreciated as the central problem of the time in which we live, by bourgeois as well as proletarian, by politically rightist and leftist thinkers. Thus, History and Class Consciousness exerted a profound effect in the circles of the youthful intelligentsia."
- 本の長さ408ページ
- 言語英語
- 出版社The MIT Press
- 発売日1972/11/15
- 寸法20.37 x 13.41 x 1.98 cm
- ISBN-100262620200
- ISBN-13978-0262620208
この著者の人気タイトル
商品の説明
レビュー
著者について
Rodney Livingstone, Reader in German at the University of Southampton, has edited and translated numerous works by Lukács, Theodor Adorno, and others.
登録情報
- 出版社 : The MIT Press (1972/11/15)
- 発売日 : 1972/11/15
- 言語 : 英語
- ペーパーバック : 408ページ
- ISBN-10 : 0262620200
- ISBN-13 : 978-0262620208
- 寸法 : 20.37 x 13.41 x 1.98 cm
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 291,626位洋書 (洋書の売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 113位Radical Political Thought
- - 1,822位Literary Criticism & Theory
- - 2,157位Social History
- カスタマーレビュー:
著者について
著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
他の国からのトップレビュー
Now there are some sections of this book that went right over my head. When Lukacs begins to wrestle with Kant, and all the subsequent German Idealists, I was lost. His arguments seem valid, but I'm in no learned position to weigh on this definitively. Nonetheless, his essays on dialectics, Rosa Luxemburg, the law, and class consciousness, are definitely positive contributions to philosophy. If Marx has spent all his time writing philosophy, instead of mastering Political Economy, I'm fairly certain this would be the book he would have written. Of course Marx would have also rebuked anyone for spending all their time writing Philosophy, but Lukacs gets a pass for having actually participated in his local Hungarian revolution. Much to the chagrin of his past sociological colleagues, he jettisoned his old schools of thought: Hegelianism, Durkheim's work, Weber, etc. and become a convicted Marxists from the revolution, until his death.
There's undoubtedly a religious element to Lukacs Marxism, in the entire book I saw him disagree with Marx once. Okay fine, he didn't actually disagree, he just said Marx should have elaborated a certain point more. But really, this is the type of propagandizing, and certainty we ought to be pushing in the school system, and demanding of all citizens (am I joking?). There's nothing wrong with the impeccable logic of: Marx said it, therefore it's true. In an era of religious Marxist fervor (i.e., right after the Bolshevik revolution), Lukacs may not be the MOST religious Marxists in the room (or maybe he is...), but he is certainly giving the best sermon, and offering the best philosophy.
He wrote one more book, that defends this book, from more determinist and Stalanistic critics. This book was recently found in Stalin's actual archives (I believe), and is now published. After grappling with Kant, I intend to re-read Lukacs theory of reification and weigh in on his critiques of Kant, and then perhaps read his subsequent book defending this one.