プライム無料体験をお試しいただけます
プライム無料体験で、この注文から無料配送特典をご利用いただけます。
非会員 | プライム会員 | |
---|---|---|
通常配送 | ¥410 - ¥450* | 無料 |
お急ぎ便 | ¥510 - ¥550 | |
お届け日時指定便 | ¥510 - ¥650 |
*Amazon.co.jp発送商品の注文額 ¥3,500以上は非会員も無料
無料体験はいつでもキャンセルできます。30日のプライム無料体験をぜひお試しください。
¥3,446¥3,446 税込
発送元: Amazon.co.jp 販売者: Amazon.co.jp
¥1,987¥1,987 税込
配送料 ¥240 6月16日-18日にお届け
発送元: バリューブックス 【防水梱包で、丁寧に発送します】 販売者: バリューブックス 【防水梱包で、丁寧に発送します】
無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。
ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。
携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。
Essays in Radical Empiricism ペーパーバック – 1996/4/1
購入オプションとあわせ買い
Radical empiricism takes us into a “world of pure experience.” In the essays, as introducer Ellen Kappy Suckiel notes, “James inquires into the metaphysically basic reality underlying the common-sense objects of our world. It is here that he defends his view that ‘experience’ is the sole and ultimate reality.” The essays deal with the applications of this “pure” or “neutral” experience: the general problem of relations, the role of feeling in experience, the nature of truth. Horace M. Kallen observed: “The fundamental point of these essays is that the relations between things, holding them together or separating them, are at least as real as the things themselves . . . and that no hidden substrata are necessary to account for the clashes and coherences of the world.”
- 本の長さ282ページ
- 言語英語
- 出版社Univ of Nebraska Pr
- 発売日1996/4/1
- 寸法13.56 x 1.78 x 20.24 cm
- ISBN-100803275897
- ISBN-13978-0803275898
商品の説明
著者について
登録情報
- 出版社 : Univ of Nebraska Pr (1996/4/1)
- 発売日 : 1996/4/1
- 言語 : 英語
- ペーパーバック : 282ページ
- ISBN-10 : 0803275897
- ISBN-13 : 978-0803275898
- 寸法 : 13.56 x 1.78 x 20.24 cm
- カスタマーレビュー:
著者について
著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
カスタマーレビュー
私たちの目標は、すべてのレビューを信頼性の高い、有益なものにすることです。だからこそ、私たちはテクノロジーと人間の調査員の両方を活用して、お客様が偽のレビューを見る前にブロックしています。 詳細はこちら
コミュニティガイドラインに違反するAmazonアカウントはブロックされます。また、レビューを購入した出品者をブロックし、そのようなレビューを投稿した当事者に対して法的措置を取ります。 報告方法について学ぶ
他の国からのトップレビュー
by "Empiricism," many authors mean that nothing exists, unless it can be sensed with a human's five senses or measured with instruments made by humans. That is not what James meant by "Empiricism," at least not by "Radical Empiricism".
Honestly, I had difficulty understanding James by reading this book. I got about twenty pages in and had to refer out to summaries of James' thought.
My daughter, the philosophy major, insists on reading the authors in their own words rather than accepting the explanations of later "experts." I do that when I can. But in the case of James, I had to look him up on the "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" or SEP.
From that brief overview of James' Philosophy, I understood far more about him than I got from attempting this book. Now that I get where he was trying to go, now I will attempt reading James' own writing again.
I also gained some insight about James from the book, 50 Psychology Classics, which I downloaded the audio free from my local library and listened to on my earbuds. But this treatment was much lighter than the S.E.P. That survey covered James' textbook on Psychology
50 PHILOSOPHY Classics, I also got from my library Overdrive as audio, has a great synopsis of James' book Pragmatism. I know many people think these summary books are cheesy and biased and maybe they are. In the case of James, I really gained something from this overview. It explains the difference, in James' mind, between Pragmatism and Empiricism:
In his book Pragmatism, James explains that Empiricism dismisses anything that can't be sensed with a human's five senses or measured by a machine made by a human. Pragmatism dismisses nothing, including religious experience, as long as it helps, as long as it serves. Is it useful for humans to believe in higher beings? Empiricism would say no because we can't measure them. Pragmatism would say maybe -- some religious beliefs are useful to serve us, and others are not. At least that is the difference that 50 Philosophy Classics told me.
Now that I've read a few summaries of James' thought, I feel I am ready to go back and finish "Essays in Radical Empiricism."
By the way I have heard that William James and H.G. Wells corresponded...