無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。
ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。
携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。
How to Talk About Books You Haven't Read ハードカバー – 2007/10/30
英語版
Pierre Bayard
(著),
Jeffrey Mehlman
(翻訳)
ダブルポイント 詳細
A lighthearted and provocative French best-seller argues that it is more important to understand a book's relevance than to be familiar with its details, drawing on examples from key modern works while offering specific advice on how to speak knowledgeably in a variety of social occasions.
- 本の長さ185ページ
- 言語英語
- 出版社Bloomsbury Pub Plc USA
- 発売日2007/10/30
- 寸法14.4 x 2.13 x 19.81 cm
- ISBN-101596914696
- ISBN-13978-1596914698
商品の説明
著者について
Pierre Bayard is a professor of French literature at the University of Paris VIII and a psychoanalyst. He is the author of Who Killed Roger Ackroyd?and of many other books.
登録情報
- 出版社 : Bloomsbury Pub Plc USA (2007/10/30)
- 発売日 : 2007/10/30
- 言語 : 英語
- ハードカバー : 185ページ
- ISBN-10 : 1596914696
- ISBN-13 : 978-1596914698
- 寸法 : 14.4 x 2.13 x 19.81 cm
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 197,055位洋書 (洋書の売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 1,710位Literary Movements & Periods
- カスタマーレビュー:
著者について
著者をフォローして、新作のアップデートや改善されたおすすめを入手してください。
著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
カスタマーレビュー
星5つ中4.1つ
5つのうち4.1つ
全体的な星の数と星別のパーセンテージの内訳を計算するにあたり、単純平均は使用されていません。当システムでは、レビューがどの程度新しいか、レビュー担当者がAmazonで購入したかどうかなど、特定の要素をより重視しています。 詳細はこちら
104グローバルレーティング
虚偽のレビューは一切容認しません
私たちの目標は、すべてのレビューを信頼性の高い、有益なものにすることです。だからこそ、私たちはテクノロジーと人間の調査員の両方を活用して、お客様が偽のレビューを見る前にブロックしています。 詳細はこちら
コミュニティガイドラインに違反するAmazonアカウントはブロックされます。また、レビューを購入した出品者をブロックし、そのようなレビューを投稿した当事者に対して法的措置を取ります。 報告方法について学ぶ
他の国からのトップレビュー
Robert A. Campbell
5つ星のうち5.0
Hilarious and thought-provoking
2017年12月13日にカナダでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
A profound meditation on the printed word. One of the best books I've read in a long time.
Camber
5つ星のうち5.0
Brilliant and Liberating: A Must-Read for Readers (and Non-Readers)!
2009年7月1日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
This is among the very best books I've ever read, and is so packed with profound insight that I'm not sure how to review it, even after having read the print version a few months ago and having just finished listening to the unabridged audiobook. But one would hope that two passes through the book are sufficient, and I've recently gotten into the practice of reviewing every book I read (or listen to), so I guess it's time to try.
I think that the main thing this book accomplishes is to "invert" our relationship to books. Most of us are conditioned to treat books as though they're fixed objects with fixed contents, and so our job is to struggle to attain an "accurate" and "complete" understanding of each book, much as a scientist might aim to understand an atom, rock, or starfish. Therefore, if we're unable to properly understand a book in the first place, or if we come to misunderstand or forget a book over time, the fault and failure are ours.
Instead of falling prey to this sad state of affairs, Bayard teaches us that we should view books as being there to serve us, not the other way around (hence the inversion), and so we should freely take (or not take) what we need and want from books. And the "us" I refer to is each of us as an individual, as well as all of us collectively, interacting both with each other and with the (essentially infinite) universe of books.
When we adopt this perspective, we realize that there's no sin in skimming books, forgetting books, abandoning books, learning about books through the comments of others, interpreting books in an idiosyncratic way, disagreeing with books, judging that books are poorly written, or even deliberately not reading particular books at all. Sometimes it might even be permissible to talk about books you haven't read.
Bayard convincingly leads us to this perspective in a systematic and sophisticated way, using well-chosen case studies and very witty and entertaining prose (translated flawlessly from the original French). Sometimes Bayard engages in what seems like provocative hyperbole, but I don't think that this book is quite a work of satire, since all of the ideas fit together too coherently. Rather, I think that even Bayard's hyperbole always contains a kernel of truth, and often much more than a kernel, so part of the reader's challenge and fun is to figure out how seriously to take him.
Again, this is one the very best books I've ever read, so of course I highly recommend it, especially for people who read with any regularity. Indeed, for that audience this book is a must read, even though the book makes the case that non-reading is also sometimes appropriate. This book has the potential to radically transform your relationship to books in a way that's liberating and even empowering.
Ultimately, Bayard doesn't argue for not reading, or reading in a lazy or sloppy way. He argues for reading actively and wisely, with a conscious awareness of what one hopes to gain from reading.
I think that the main thing this book accomplishes is to "invert" our relationship to books. Most of us are conditioned to treat books as though they're fixed objects with fixed contents, and so our job is to struggle to attain an "accurate" and "complete" understanding of each book, much as a scientist might aim to understand an atom, rock, or starfish. Therefore, if we're unable to properly understand a book in the first place, or if we come to misunderstand or forget a book over time, the fault and failure are ours.
Instead of falling prey to this sad state of affairs, Bayard teaches us that we should view books as being there to serve us, not the other way around (hence the inversion), and so we should freely take (or not take) what we need and want from books. And the "us" I refer to is each of us as an individual, as well as all of us collectively, interacting both with each other and with the (essentially infinite) universe of books.
When we adopt this perspective, we realize that there's no sin in skimming books, forgetting books, abandoning books, learning about books through the comments of others, interpreting books in an idiosyncratic way, disagreeing with books, judging that books are poorly written, or even deliberately not reading particular books at all. Sometimes it might even be permissible to talk about books you haven't read.
Bayard convincingly leads us to this perspective in a systematic and sophisticated way, using well-chosen case studies and very witty and entertaining prose (translated flawlessly from the original French). Sometimes Bayard engages in what seems like provocative hyperbole, but I don't think that this book is quite a work of satire, since all of the ideas fit together too coherently. Rather, I think that even Bayard's hyperbole always contains a kernel of truth, and often much more than a kernel, so part of the reader's challenge and fun is to figure out how seriously to take him.
Again, this is one the very best books I've ever read, so of course I highly recommend it, especially for people who read with any regularity. Indeed, for that audience this book is a must read, even though the book makes the case that non-reading is also sometimes appropriate. This book has the potential to radically transform your relationship to books in a way that's liberating and even empowering.
Ultimately, Bayard doesn't argue for not reading, or reading in a lazy or sloppy way. He argues for reading actively and wisely, with a conscious awareness of what one hopes to gain from reading.
Jonathan Miller
5つ星のうち5.0
Absolutely splendid
2007年12月2日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
More than a practical guide, this is a meditation on reading impeccably translated by Jeffrey Mehlman. Drawing on sources from Gustave Flaubert and Oscar Wilde to Umberto Eco and David Lodge, the book is insightful, scholarly, shocking and profoundly convincing. This is a must for any bibliophile's holiday stocking and a source of great comfort for those of us who have never got through Proust. A magnificent tour de force.
David Evans
5つ星のうち4.0
Pierre, almost thou persuadest me to be a non-reader! [1]
2010年8月3日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Bayard's book is both witty and insightful. Here are the two messages I take away from it:
2. Being willing to fearlessly engage about books we have not read cover-to-cover (or at all) opens the door to greater creativity within us, as we are less likely to get entirely wrapped up in the ideas of others, but rather we can use whatever elements we have encountered as a springboard for our own creativity.
In each chapter, Bayard explores some element of "non-reading," using a different book as a text. For example, he draws on Graham Greene's The Third Man [2] as an example of how to speak in society about books we haven't read (as the protagonist is forced to do at one point) and on Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose [3] to demonstrate decoding what a book is about only from what you've heard about it (as the protagonist of that book must do). One chapter even uses a film as its text, none other than the brilliant Groundhog Day (on how to seduce someone by talking about books you haven't read). Ironically, I will surely go on to read several of the books he described (but don't worry, Pierre, I'm sure I will forget them soon after.) One of the funniest innovations is Bayard's system of footnoting, which consists of the following abbreviations:
Note there is no marking for "Book I've read," as part of the premise is that there is no book we have simply read. Even those books we have read cover-to-cover are books we have already begun to forget or to remember incorrectly.
Another fun element is a game called Humiliation, introduced in the chapter on "Not Being Ashamed," in which players name a book they have not read but then gain a point for each person in the group who has read it, i.e., winning only by demonstrating oneself as less well-read. We played that game at a recent family event and had loads of fun humbling ourselves. (It also works with films.)
There is even a surprising revelation in the penultimate chapter "Inventing Books," which is a significant accomplishment for a book of this genre. (It's like The Sixth Sense [4] of literary criticism. Or The Village [5]. Or Invincible [6].)
Just as Anne Fadiman's essay "Never Do That To A Book" in Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader [7], Bayard may actually have changed my relationship to books, giving me license and a rationale to appreciate, interpret, and - most importantly - talk about books that I have experienced more casually than others.
* A friend asked me how forgetting a book can lead to a meaningful interaction: Bayard's premise, with which I concur, is that as we forget books, what we actual remember reflects less the book and more ourselves, which is a valuable starting place for a meaningful interaction.
[1] Adapted from Acts 26:28, The Bible, BS++
[2] BH++
[3] BF+
[4] MF++
[5] MF-
[6] MF+
[7] BF++
2. Being willing to fearlessly engage about books we have not read cover-to-cover (or at all) opens the door to greater creativity within us, as we are less likely to get entirely wrapped up in the ideas of others, but rather we can use whatever elements we have encountered as a springboard for our own creativity.
In each chapter, Bayard explores some element of "non-reading," using a different book as a text. For example, he draws on Graham Greene's The Third Man [2] as an example of how to speak in society about books we haven't read (as the protagonist is forced to do at one point) and on Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose [3] to demonstrate decoding what a book is about only from what you've heard about it (as the protagonist of that book must do). One chapter even uses a film as its text, none other than the brilliant Groundhog Day (on how to seduce someone by talking about books you haven't read). Ironically, I will surely go on to read several of the books he described (but don't worry, Pierre, I'm sure I will forget them soon after.) One of the funniest innovations is Bayard's system of footnoting, which consists of the following abbreviations:
Note there is no marking for "Book I've read," as part of the premise is that there is no book we have simply read. Even those books we have read cover-to-cover are books we have already begun to forget or to remember incorrectly.
Another fun element is a game called Humiliation, introduced in the chapter on "Not Being Ashamed," in which players name a book they have not read but then gain a point for each person in the group who has read it, i.e., winning only by demonstrating oneself as less well-read. We played that game at a recent family event and had loads of fun humbling ourselves. (It also works with films.)
There is even a surprising revelation in the penultimate chapter "Inventing Books," which is a significant accomplishment for a book of this genre. (It's like The Sixth Sense [4] of literary criticism. Or The Village [5]. Or Invincible [6].)
Just as Anne Fadiman's essay "Never Do That To A Book" in Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader [7], Bayard may actually have changed my relationship to books, giving me license and a rationale to appreciate, interpret, and - most importantly - talk about books that I have experienced more casually than others.
* A friend asked me how forgetting a book can lead to a meaningful interaction: Bayard's premise, with which I concur, is that as we forget books, what we actual remember reflects less the book and more ourselves, which is a valuable starting place for a meaningful interaction.
[1] Adapted from Acts 26:28, The Bible, BS++
[2] BH++
[3] BF+
[4] MF++
[5] MF-
[6] MF+
[7] BF++