お届け先を選択
すべての出品を見る
Kindleアプリのロゴ画像

無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。

ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。

携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。

KindleアプリをダウンロードするためのQRコード

著者をフォローする

ジョン・ネズビッツ
+ フォロー
Douglas Philips
+ フォロー
すべてを表示
何か問題が発生しました。後で再度リクエストしてください。

ハイテクハイタッチ: ハイテクハイタッチとは物事を眺めるときに必要な人間らしさというレンズ 単行本 – 2001/6/1

4.4 5つ星のうち4.4 22個の評価
すべての形式と版を表示
ハイテクゲームと青少年の殺人事件の関連を分析し、生殖細胞遺伝子治療など遺伝子にまつわる今日的な問題に言及する問題作。
続きを読む もっと少なく読む
Previous page
  1. 本の長さ
    324ページ
  2. 言語
    日本語
  3. 出版社
    ダイヤモンド社
  4. 発売日
    2001/6/1
  5. ISBN-10
    4478190402
  6. ISBN-13
    978-4478190401
  7. すべての詳細を表示
Next page

商品の説明

内容（「MARC」データベースより）

遺伝子プロファイル、TVゲームと少年による殺人の関連性、クローン人間…。人間はどこへ向かおうとしているのか? テクノロジーと人間の関係を、家族関係や宗教、芸術などを含めた文化的なコンテクストから読み解く。

登録情報

  • 出版社 ‏ : ‎ ダイヤモンド社 (2001/6/1)
  • 発売日 ‏ : ‎ 2001/6/1
  • 言語 ‏ : ‎ 日本語
  • 単行本 ‏ : ‎ 324ページ
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 4478190402
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-4478190401
  • カスタマーレビュー:
    4.4 5つ星のうち4.4 22個の評価

著者について

著者をフォローして、新作のアップデートや改善されたおすすめを入手してください。
前のページ
  1. ジョン・ネズビッツ

    ジョン・ネズビッツ

    Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
    Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

    著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう

    著者ページでもっと見る
  2. Douglas Philips

    Douglas Philips

    Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
    Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

    著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう

    著者ページでもっと見る
次のページ

カスタマーレビュー

星5つ中4.4つ
5つのうち4.4つ
22グローバルレーティング

この商品をレビュー

他のお客様にも意見を伝えましょう
カスタマーレビューを書く

上位レビュー、対象国： 日本

star to fall
5つ星のうち5.0 ハイテクの功罪
2003年12月27日に日本でレビュー済み
戦後の技術革新によって我々の生活は大変豊かになりました。この本では、それがもたらす暗部（クローン、ＴＶゲームなど）を紹介しています。当然技術開発を行うこと自体に責任があるのではなく、大事なのはこのような技術がいかに人間としての価値観を高めるかということでしょう。
2人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立った
 レポート

他の国からのトップレビュー

すべてのレビューを日本語に翻訳
Olegario Araujo
5つ星のうち5.0 A tecnologia como aliada das relações humanas
2017年12月9日にブラジルでレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
Este livro, escrito antes do ano 2000, aborda a importância do relacionamento, ou do toque humano em um ambiente altamente tecnológico. Vital para ampliarmos nossa compreensão do momento atual.
レポート
OwenCanada
5つ星のうち5.0 Very good assessment of the challenges of more technology being isolating ...
2015年5月26日にカナダでレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
Very good assessment of the challenges of more technology being isolating instead of increasing face to face social interaction with people. Fascinating assessment of culture and society.
レポート
Antonio leite egito
5つ星のうち5.0 O impacto dos videomonitoramentos inteligentes
2019年3月4日にブラジルでレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
Uso para atualização de tecnologias
レポート
Alicia Crumpton
5つ星のうち4.0 Exploring Technology In our Lives
2013年11月25日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
Naisbitt, J., Naisbitt, N., & Philips, D. (2001). High tech high touch: Technology and our accelerated search for meaning. Nicholas Brealey Pub.
John Naisbitt was an author and public speaker on social forecast and futures. Nana Naisbitt, his daughter and artist Douglas Philips co-authored this book.

Naisbitt et al. argue that we need to intentionally question "what place technology should have in our lives and in society." They then explore a range of topics including: the influence of technology on people, military-Nintendo games, violence, and impact; genetic technology and concerns surrounding it; death, sex, and the body. Central to their premise is the idea that "Over time, America has transformed from a technologically comfortable place into a Technologically Intoxicated Zone." This zone is characterized by people's (a) favoring the quick fix; (b) fear and worship of technology; (c) blurred distinctions between real and fake; (d) acceptance of violence as normal; (e) love of technology as a toy; and (7) being distanced and distracted. Being a reflective consumer, is described as the way to transcend the Zone. Reflectivity includes considering the consequences of new technology introduction, the effects of technology, and the value-add potential for the technology.

There's a lot of books written on technology and our interaction with it since this book was published. Certainly look at Neil Postman, Sherry Turkle, Nicholas Carr, Nancy Baym, to name a few. High Tech/High Touch was defined as "the conscious integration of technology into our lives". Some of the authors I mentioned and many others continue to explore the intersection (integration?) of technology and human behaviors particularly identity, relationships, communication, and sense of community. Even though this is an older read - I marveled at how the questions and concerns are still discussed today with no clear answers or outcomes.
3人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
 レポート
G.
5つ星のうち2.0 You could drive a mac truck through the logical gaps
2004年2月9日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
Don't read this book. It will confuse you into thinking that the world of technology is dangerous and emotionally painful, without every actually explaining to you how or why. The only reason I don't give it fewer stars is that it's real easy to read. The problem is, it doesn't actually say anything.
I'm doing my master's thesis on how technology effects human experience of meaning, and I was really looking forward to this book as a layman's thought-provoking look at the subject. By the time I was halfway through it, I was ready to bang my head against a wall. There's just no substance, no logical progression of thought-the whole thing is full of semi-neurotic, somewhat morbid emotional appeals (e.g. naming a section about video games "From Pingpong to Murder") and unsupported logical jumps. The author clearly passionately believes that using technology isn't "soul enriching," and that using it so much is driving us into the arms of numb, addictive distractions; he bases the whole book on those assumptions without ever making a case for why they're true.
High Tech, High Touch is constructed more like a repetitious epic poem of lamentation than it is any real discussion of anything. Long laundry lists of statements, both of facts and of melancholy poetic conjecture, which never build to any kind of analysis. Example, on p. 45:
"The most dangerous promise of technology is that it will make our children smarter. President Bill Clinton's 1996 State of the Union address proclaimed 'the Internet in every classroom' to be a noble goal. Access to information will not teach synthesis and analysis. School expenditures in information technology reached [a high number] in 1997, yet at the same time programs for music and the arts were defunded. [sic]" (p. 45)
That sounds pretty bad, right? Sure it does. But what does it actually say? It doesn't actually say that technology won't make children smarter, or what really does make them smarter. It doesn't explain why it's not noble to have the internet in classrooms. It implies that students don't analyze or synthesize information via the net, only access it, but it never supports or explains that idea (Online classes? Educational software? Email discussions with experts? Forums where other people are studying similar subjecs? How is net research different than library research r.e. analysis and synthesis?) It doesn't say how much, or where, the arts were defunded, and it implies that the arts are more "noble" than online networking but doesn't explain why. The entire book is like that.
This book is grounded in a concept that embodies an increasing psychological disconnect between two generations: those who grew up with networked technology, and those who didn't. The concept is: "If an event or interpersonal transaction doesn't take place in the physical world, it can't fundamentally benefit or fulfill you." This book assumes that and restates it dozens and dozens (and dozens) of times, but it never actually provides an argument for why we should believe it. To a lot of people who didn't grow up with technology, that statement is so intuitively, emotionally obvious that it doesn't need to be supported or explained. The problem is that, according to a great volume of current research being done with the "net generation," that concept is -not- intuitively obvious to -them-. They find personal significance, power, community, and existential meaning in the things they do online. These two different experiences of an emerging trend must -both- be acknowledged in any supposed assessment of technology's effects on human psychology or quality of life.
If you want to learn about what technology is doing to our minds, read Smartmobs or Growing Up Digital. If you want to learn about consumerism and overwork and meaning, read Your Money or Your Life. They'll show you more than poetry and fear.
15人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
 レポート