パイレーツ・オブ・カリビアン / 呪われた海賊たち コレクターズ・エディション [DVD]
仕様 | 価格 | 新品 | 中古品 |
DVD
"もう一度試してください。" | コレクターズ・エディション | ¥1,490 | ¥1 |
DVD
"もう一度試してください。" | コレクターズ・エディション |
—
| ¥1,580 | ¥1 |
DVD
"もう一度試してください。" | コレクターズ・エディション |
—
| — | ¥1 |
今すぐ観る | レンタル | 購入 |
フォーマット | 色, ドルビー, ワイドスクリーン |
コントリビュータ | ジェフリー・ラッシュ, キーラ・ナイトレイ, テッド・エリオット, ゴア・ヴァービンスキー, オーランド・ブルーム, ジョニー・デップ |
言語 | 英語, 日本語 |
稼働時間 | 2 時間 23 分 |
この商品をチェックした人はこんな商品もチェックしています
ページ 1 以下のうち 1 最初から観るページ 1 以下のうち 1
商品の説明
Amazonより
18世紀のカリブ海を舞台に、海賊たちの呪いを解く黄金のメダルの「最後の1枚」をめぐる、アクション・アドベンチャー。港町ポート・ロイヤルの総督の娘エリザベスが、その1枚を持っていたことから、海賊の一団にさらわれ、彼女を愛する青年と、一匹狼の海賊が救出へ向かうという物語だ。
ポイントに見せ場を配し、娯楽作に徹した作りで最後まで飽きさせないのは、さすがにジェリー・ブラッカイマー製作。ゴア・ヴァービンスキー監督は、カット割りやカメラ・アングル、音楽の付け方などアクションの見せ方がうまく、なかでも満月の夜、海賊たちががい骨となって現れるシーンの恐怖は、リアルなVFXが効果を上げている。
この種の映画では、俳優たちの演技は二の次になるのだが、本作はオスカー俳優のジェフリー・ラッシュ、『ロード・オブ・ザ・リング』のレゴラス役、オーランド・ブルームらが嬉々として演じている。そして、ジョニー・デップの存在感! 台詞回しや道化的な動きで笑わせる彼が、ラストに見せる凛々しい表情は文句なしにカッコいい。彼ら欧米の俳優にとって、海賊は憧れの役だというのが、ヒシヒシと伝わってくる。(斉藤博昭)
レビュー
製作総指揮: マイク・ステンソン/チャド・オーメン/ブルース・ヘンドリックス/ポール・ディーソン 製作: ジェリー・ブラッカイマー 監督: ゴア・ヴァービンスキー 共同脚本・ストーリー: テッド・エリオット/テリー・ロッシオ ストーリー: スチュアート・ビーティー/ジェイ・ウォルパート プロダクションデザイン: ブライアン・モリス 音楽: ボブ・バダミ 出演: ジョニー・デップ/オーランド・ブルーム/キーラ・ナイトレイ/ジェフリー・ラッシュ
-- 内容(「CDジャーナル」データベースより)
登録情報
- アスペクト比 : 2.35:1
- 言語 : 英語, 日本語
- 梱包サイズ : 18.03 x 13.76 x 1.48 cm; 83 g
- EAN : 4959241938480
- 監督 : ゴア・ヴァービンスキー
- メディア形式 : 色, ドルビー, ワイドスクリーン
- 時間 : 2 時間 23 分
- 発売日 : 2005/3/18
- 出演 : ジョニー・デップ, オーランド・ブルーム, キーラ・ナイトレイ, ジェフリー・ラッシュ
- 字幕: : 日本語, 英語
- 言語 : 日本語 (Dolby Digital 6.1 EX), 英語 (Dolby Digital 6.1 EX)
- 販売元 : ブエナ・ビスタ・ホーム・エンターテイメント
- ASIN : B00069BLEO
- ディスク枚数 : 2
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 152,823位DVD (DVDの売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 1,473位外国のアドベンチャー映画
- - 11,848位外国のアクション映画
- カスタマーレビュー:
イメージ付きのレビュー
5 星
映像が素晴らしい
映像は相当綺麗です。とにかく圧倒的な美しさが画面上に存在しています。自分の環境では全く非の付けどころがない。ノイズもありませんしコントラストもいい、暗いシーンまでくっきりと綺麗な闇が描かれている。他のBD作品と比べても圧倒的な部類に入ります。2作目を先に観ましたがさすがに及ばず共それに迫る勢い。音も実に鮮明でクリア。迫力があり広がりもあるサウンド。音の情報量が多いというのでしょうかとにかくすごい。ストーリーは正にエンターテイメント作品。リアルな海賊映画というものではなく、エンターテイメントとなっています。宝探しのような類いのストーリーではなく非現実的な世界を楽しむ事ができる。独特なノリの展開は個人的には好きです。役者とキャラの一体感は秀逸。この役者あってこその映画だと思います。家族で観れる娯楽映画としては安心して楽しめる内容になっているのではないでしょうか。特典はSD画質ながら1枚のディスクが丸々特典と力が入っていたり、本編ディスクにもHD画質の特典が入っていたりと豪華。画質、音質の面を考慮して総合的には満点。
フィードバックをお寄せいただきありがとうございます
申し訳ありませんが、エラーが発生しました
申し訳ありませんが、レビューを読み込めませんでした
-
トップレビュー
上位レビュー、対象国: 日本
レビューのフィルタリング中に問題が発生しました。後でもう一度試してください。
2024年4月28日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
息子のリクエストで購入。特に問題無かった様です。
2024年2月5日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
パイレーツ・オブ・カリビアンといえば、ジョニーデップ!素敵な演技です!!!
物語もディズニーランドの乗り物と同じにしてくれてて嬉しい限りです♪
月明かりで正体が分かるシーンなんかは、ドキドキして毎回見ています!!
オタクと言われてしまうけど、100回は見ています(笑)
物語もディズニーランドの乗り物と同じにしてくれてて嬉しい限りです♪
月明かりで正体が分かるシーンなんかは、ドキドキして毎回見ています!!
オタクと言われてしまうけど、100回は見ています(笑)
2024年2月6日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
夏といえば、ジャック・スパロウ!!!
ディズニープラス入ってない人に良き。
ディズニープラス入ってない人に良き。
2023年8月16日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
20年前の作品、知人の勧めで初めて見ました。
ジョニーデップ劇場ですね、最高でした。
すぐに次作を見てみたくなりました。
ジョニーデップ劇場ですね、最高でした。
すぐに次作を見てみたくなりました。
他の国からのトップレビュー
Walter C
5つ星のうち5.0
Shipping and Quality
2021年4月26日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
I now have all of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies
Nutextractor2000
5つ星のうち5.0
Great
2023年1月15日にオーストラリアでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
The transfer is really good, and the bonus features are awesome and feel complete
SAF
5つ星のうち5.0
Great film
2023年7月20日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Had this originally and lent it out but didn't get it back. Had to get a replacement as it's such a great film that introduced us to all the characters I loved.
Lord Frugal
5つ星のうち4.0
Review for Males: Highly Entertaining...that's what you want, right?
2006年7月10日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
I'll have to admit that I'm substance over style when it comes to movies. In fact, I didn't even hesitate refusing this one in theaters for two reasons:
1) It's a Disney flick, so there's always the threat of syrupy goodness through morals, bubbly yet not funny gags (which were prevalent in the previews that also made the movie seem a bit unoriginal), and characters who have a better chance of being remembered by infants, who have imaginations so vivid that poor CGI and a weak story is a stroke of genius(if you take into account Disney's other works that came out around this time, then you'd know that this reason is true, except Pixar, b-cuz those movies are Pixar productions through Disney distribution and therefore don't count).
2)Actors starring in POTC provoked suspicion: Johnny Depp= chick magnet/acceptable by males b-cuz they most likely haven't watched that teen-soap he starred in, but has seen his other performances that has earned him a cool actor pass (the coolness right below Deniro, Pacino, Hopkins, etc...) Orlando Bloom= chick magnet/unacceptable by males because he really hasn't paid any dues as far as showing any real talent and is only in this movie because he's a chick magnet before being a 1/3rd decent actor.
So I guess it's fair to say that my reasons are only from the outside looking in rather than looking into it and judging when I get outside.
It wasn't until I stumbled upon it while my relentlessly renting father rented a bunch of new movies and I caught him watching it. After watching it halfway through to the end, then watching from the beginning to the end, then watching it all over again, I realized I was almost a closed-minded fool. I won't be rushing to the next Johnny Depp/Orlando Bloom colaboration or anything, but if they're recurring the roles for another POTC, then I'm definitely down for it! This movie was a good peice of work. Screw the fact that this was "historically inaccurate and that pirates raped, killed, and stood as a symbol of selfishness" (which, in fact, isn't really historically accurate to all pirates, but that's another discussion)...this was a highly entertaining movie. It's an adventure as big as Indiana Jones with lush environments, situational action sequences and gags that are inventive, and small intriguing plot twists that both make sense and save a character at the same time. If that's not enough, Geoffrey Rush (probably the only reason I would see the movie, but wasn't enough to make me risk a night of debauchery to watch it) is the antagonist who retains that brash arrogance yet animalistic flair that makes him cool to watch. Orlando Bloom, while a chick magnet, is likeable in that he is treated like a newbie (synonymous with my statement of his acting experience) and is hazed, or punked, pretty regularly by Depp, who (here's the interesting part) uses a coherent variation of his character in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, which is infectious and captivating to the point where you forget about who plays the character and you instantly think he's a good antihero. It's also at a good length. I've always considered good movies at 120 minutes +, a decent expenditure. So yes, this movie is worth buying as long as you can accept that it's meant to be an excerise in entertaining everyone, then even the most hardcore of masculine movie-buffs will enjoy this as a guilty pleasure. I gave it four stars because, like I said, it attempts and succeeds to entertain everybody. So there is love and hope and rare sappy one-liners that are sooo not the reason why I enjoyed it that I'm sure any self-respecting man would be hesitant to suggest it as a viable selection to those among his brethren who haven't seen it without proving that he's borderline gay.
1) It's a Disney flick, so there's always the threat of syrupy goodness through morals, bubbly yet not funny gags (which were prevalent in the previews that also made the movie seem a bit unoriginal), and characters who have a better chance of being remembered by infants, who have imaginations so vivid that poor CGI and a weak story is a stroke of genius(if you take into account Disney's other works that came out around this time, then you'd know that this reason is true, except Pixar, b-cuz those movies are Pixar productions through Disney distribution and therefore don't count).
2)Actors starring in POTC provoked suspicion: Johnny Depp= chick magnet/acceptable by males b-cuz they most likely haven't watched that teen-soap he starred in, but has seen his other performances that has earned him a cool actor pass (the coolness right below Deniro, Pacino, Hopkins, etc...) Orlando Bloom= chick magnet/unacceptable by males because he really hasn't paid any dues as far as showing any real talent and is only in this movie because he's a chick magnet before being a 1/3rd decent actor.
So I guess it's fair to say that my reasons are only from the outside looking in rather than looking into it and judging when I get outside.
It wasn't until I stumbled upon it while my relentlessly renting father rented a bunch of new movies and I caught him watching it. After watching it halfway through to the end, then watching from the beginning to the end, then watching it all over again, I realized I was almost a closed-minded fool. I won't be rushing to the next Johnny Depp/Orlando Bloom colaboration or anything, but if they're recurring the roles for another POTC, then I'm definitely down for it! This movie was a good peice of work. Screw the fact that this was "historically inaccurate and that pirates raped, killed, and stood as a symbol of selfishness" (which, in fact, isn't really historically accurate to all pirates, but that's another discussion)...this was a highly entertaining movie. It's an adventure as big as Indiana Jones with lush environments, situational action sequences and gags that are inventive, and small intriguing plot twists that both make sense and save a character at the same time. If that's not enough, Geoffrey Rush (probably the only reason I would see the movie, but wasn't enough to make me risk a night of debauchery to watch it) is the antagonist who retains that brash arrogance yet animalistic flair that makes him cool to watch. Orlando Bloom, while a chick magnet, is likeable in that he is treated like a newbie (synonymous with my statement of his acting experience) and is hazed, or punked, pretty regularly by Depp, who (here's the interesting part) uses a coherent variation of his character in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, which is infectious and captivating to the point where you forget about who plays the character and you instantly think he's a good antihero. It's also at a good length. I've always considered good movies at 120 minutes +, a decent expenditure. So yes, this movie is worth buying as long as you can accept that it's meant to be an excerise in entertaining everyone, then even the most hardcore of masculine movie-buffs will enjoy this as a guilty pleasure. I gave it four stars because, like I said, it attempts and succeeds to entertain everybody. So there is love and hope and rare sappy one-liners that are sooo not the reason why I enjoyed it that I'm sure any self-respecting man would be hesitant to suggest it as a viable selection to those among his brethren who haven't seen it without proving that he's borderline gay.
Jaysview
5つ星のうち5.0
Excellent fun film
2022年8月20日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
The best of the Pirates series. Excellent fun, could not be better.
If only the writers of the entire series had managed to be as consistently good as Johnny Depp is with his character. Worth watching any of the films for Depps Captain Jack Sparrow interpretation, but the 1st and 2nd films are the best. Depp himself could not be better, his acting is excellent in all of them.
If only the writers of the entire series had managed to be as consistently good as Johnny Depp is with his character. Worth watching any of the films for Depps Captain Jack Sparrow interpretation, but the 1st and 2nd films are the best. Depp himself could not be better, his acting is excellent in all of them.