大統領の陰謀 [DVD]

—

￥850

￥385

DVD

"もう一度試してください。"

—

￥950

￥1

DVD

"もう一度試してください。"

￥1,300

￥792

DVD

"もう一度試してください。"

￥2,580

￥1,500

￥51

DVD

"もう一度試してください。"

￥2,094

￥1,762

￥692

すべての商品を表示

今すぐ観る

レンタル

購入

大統領の陰謀 (字幕版)

￥407

￥1,528

無料のプライム配送を提供していない他の出品者からより安く入手できます。

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"￥1,321","priceAmount":1321.00,"currencySymbol":"￥","integerValue":"1,321","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"lmh7U9ID6MgjCv15xmg%2Bt5BCXuH%2BLL8gfoQHWzuK8b%2FwBPQzHXR92Rral2btOewZgqzuXBuTEYRr6x2ucRJ5Npr%2Bmhdf9hl0LSEcefApFyylAiEOwXdNrEY3cqSiWt%2FrYJqSt%2FbMzNk%3D","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

購入オプションとあわせ買い

フォーマット	色, ドルビー, ワイドスクリーン
コントリビュータ	ジャック・ウォーデン, ロバート・レッドフォード, ダスティン・ホフマン, アラン・J・パクラ
言語	英語
稼働時間	2 時間 19 分

この商品に関する問題を報告する

よく一緒に購入されている商品

￥1,321

13ポイント(1%)

残り4点（入荷予定あり）

この商品は、Amazon.co.jpが販売および発送します。

￥1,020

10ポイント(1%)

残り5点（入荷予定あり）

この商品は、Amazon.co.jpが販売および発送します。

￥1,020

10ポイント(1%)

残り5点（入荷予定あり）

この商品は、Amazon.co.jpが販売および発送します。

総額:

当社の価格を見るには、これら商品をカートに追加してください。

ポイントの合計: pt

もう一度お試しください

詳細

追加されました

これらの商品のうちのいくつかが他の商品より先に発送されます。

詳細の表示詳細の非表示

一緒に購入する商品を選択してください。

メリル・ストリープ
585
DVD
25個の商品：￥562から
スティーブン・スピルバーグ
726
DVD
2個の商品：￥749から
ダスティン・ホフマン
1,398
DVD
15個の商品：￥444から
ウォーレン・ベイティ
1,832
DVD
18個の商品：￥664から
アル・パチーノ
747
DVD
12個の商品：￥1,059から
528
DVD
1個の商品：￥1,200から

メーカーによる説明


	大統領の陰謀[WB COLLECTION][AmazonDVDコレクション][DVD]	大統領の陰謀[DVD]	大統領の陰謀スペシャル・エディション[DVD]
	詳細を表示
カスタマーレビュー	2,752	2,752	2,752
価格	—	￥1,321	￥3,340
製品仕様	DVD	DVD	DVD
発売日	2018/3/17	2011/11/2	2006/5/12

商品の説明

ダスティン・ホフマンとロバート・レッドフォードが挑んだ大作!
現実がフィクションを超えた事件。

アメリカ史にその悪名を刻みつけた男。その名はニクソン。大統領であった彼を失脚させたウォーターゲート事件を暴いた2人の新聞記者。その取材活動を、克明に、センセーショナルに描き出した大作。真相究明の追跡調査をレポートした著書「大統領の陰謀」を原作に、ハリウッドを代表する2人の名優ダスティン・ホフマン、ロバート・レッドフォードが熱演。まさに迫真の演技を披露。助演男優賞を含む1976年度アカデミー賞4部門を受賞。

登録情報

アスペクト比 ‏ : ‎ 1.78:1
言語 ‏ : ‎ 英語
製品サイズ ‏ : ‎ 25 x 2.2 x 18 cm; 83.16 g
EAN ‏ : ‎ 4988135872609
監督 ‏ : ‎ アラン・J・パクラ
メディア形式 ‏ : ‎ 色, ドルビー, ワイドスクリーン
時間 ‏ : ‎ 2 時間 19 分
発売日 ‏ : ‎ 2011/11/2
出演 ‏ : ‎ ダスティン・ホフマン, ロバート・レッドフォード, ジャック・ウォーデン
字幕: ‏ : ‎ 日本語, 英語
言語 ‏ : ‎ 英語 (Mono)
販売元 ‏ : ‎ ワーナー・ホーム・ビデオ
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B005HZXHIA
原産国 ‏ : ‎ 日本
ディスク枚数 ‏ : ‎ 1

Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 50,049位DVD (DVDの売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 1,632位外国のミステリー・サスペンス映画
- - 4,567位外国のドラマ映画

カスタマーレビュー:
2,752

カスタマーレビュー

5つのうち4.3つ

2,752グローバルレーティング

この商品をレビュー

カスタマーレビューを書く

レビューのソート基準

上位レビュー、対象国：日本

すべてのレビューを日本語に翻訳

レビューのフィルタリング中に問題が発生しました。後でもう一度試してください。

Amazon カスタマー

面白かった

2024年3月9日に日本でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

実際にあったウォーターゲート事件を記者の目線で丁寧に描かれていて良かった。
それにこのコンビは最高だと思います。

2023年10月4日に日本でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

人物名がやたら出てくるので、整理するのに大変！

2023年10月13日に日本でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

全ての女性に見て欲しい！

2023年2月23日に日本でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

？

1人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています

米国における民主主義の脆弱がよく理解できる映画です。

lamia

2022年6月19日に日本でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

現在米国で起こっていることとよく比較されますが、ニクソンは自分で大統領の座を明け渡し、引き継いだフォードから恩赦を受け司法省から逃れることができました。

しかし、今回トランプは果たしてそれが出来るのかが見ものですね。
内容は少々難しいですが、この映画は非常に重要な内容であると思います。
是非ご覧頂き、米国内における問題民主主義の脆弱をご理解していただければと考えます。

5人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています

下町のリーマン

何度見てもいい作品

2021年6月12日に日本でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

数回見ているが有料でも満足できる作品の１つ。主役の2人もいいけど主幹?の男気に惚れる

2人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています

オペラ座のおっさん

メディアがまだ信じられていた時代の記念碑

2023年2月4日に日本でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

ウォーターゲート事件を真っ正面から描き切った名作と昔は思っていました。レッドフォード、ホフマンかっこいいです。アメリカ大統領をマスコミが追い詰める。日本のマスコミの無様さと比べてなんと違うことか。さすが自由と正義の国アメリカ。そんな幻想も今は吹っ飛びました。イラク戦争、トランプ報道、コロナ騒動などなど、日本のマスコミが平伏しそうな体たらくでした。ですので、昔観て感動したなあという感慨深いものが込み上げてきます。でも、映画は夢を売るものです。現実とは違うのです。フェイクではなくメディアは真実を一生懸命追求しているのだという祈りを込めて観ればいいのです。作品はよくできています。観て損はありません。もう二度とこんな作品は作れないかもしれません。

2人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています

Tonio

若きロバート・レッドフォードとダスティ・ホフマン

2019年10月9日に日本でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

「ウオーター・ゲイト事件」を追求するワシントン・ポスト紙
の２人の記者。彼らにより、ニクソン大統領辞任につながり、
ベトナム戦争終結へと至る。実話の映画化されたもの。
若きロバート・レッドフォードとダスティ・ホフマンが
共演する。当時、特に愛された俳優の共演である。

映画に「ディープ・スロート」と言われる内部通報者が
でてくる。この人物を扱った映画が、「ザ・シークレット・マン」。
ここで、ディープ・スロートがFBI副長官であったことが
明かされる。

「ペンタゴン・ペーパーズ」という映画がある。
スピルバーグ監督、メリル・ストリープとトム・ハンクス主演。
ベトナム戦争の実態を暴いた報告書が、内部通報者により
ワシントン・ポスト紙に持ち込まれる。新聞に掲載するかどうか、女性社主は悩むが、掲載の決断をする。
政府により告訴され、最高裁にまでもちこまれるが、合憲の判決。
最後に、ウオーター・ゲイト・ビルに侵入者がいるとの警察への通報のシーンで終わる。
「大統領の陰謀」に先立つ映画にあたる。

5人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています

他の国からのトップレビュー

すべてのレビューを日本語に翻訳

Daniel Q

All the Presidents Men Dvd.

2024年4月15日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

A great and compelling true story about the Watergate Scandal of the 70's, from the eyes of the journalist point of view, and their efforts to expose the truth. Would recommend it for a watch, if you've never seen it before.

Frank Schlösser

Eine sehr gute Story

2023年11月16日にドイツでレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

Zwei Journalisten der Washington Post decken ein Skandal rund um Richard Nixon auf. Die Action dieses Films gipfelt in der Recherche dieser beider Journalisten und wie Sie einen Sumpf durch Ihre Hartnäckigkeit trocken legten. Dadurch das diese DVD ein UK Import ist, habe ich festgestellt, dass bei der deutschen Fassung Einiges gekürzt wurde. Dieser Film ist eine gute Story in Bildern.

Richard Vernon

An absolute classic

2008年1月13日に英国でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

The film itself is well-known, and is the true story of the second burglary and bugging attempt on the national HQ of the US Democratic Party, which took place in June 1972, and was organised by President Richard 'Tricky Dicky' Nixon's top aides, and almost certainly the President himself, The film also touches on numerous other crimes carried out by Nixon's team. The story is told from the point of view of the two journalists who uncovered the truth, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, who were both junior Washington Post reporters, and significant parts of the dialogue in the film are taken verbatim from their book of the same name. It really only covers the first 6 months after the burglary, up to Nixon's d second inauguration, which is the period when the facts were being discovered and reported. It took another 20 months for Nixon to finally be forced to acknowledge the truth, and resign - this period is shown only as a series of headlines coming over a teleprinter. The film features one non-actor in a brief but starring role: Frank Wills, the Watergate security guard who discovered the break-in plays himself.

The second DVD is far more recent, and much of it was made following the disclosure that one of Woodward's main sources of information was Mark Felt, nicknamed 'Deep Throat' in the movie, then No. 2 at the FBI, one of the institutions corrupted by Nixon, along with the CIA and the Justice Dept. It contains:

Telling The Truth About Lies - 27 minutes
2006 documentary about the making of the film with Redford, Hoffman, Woodward, Bernstein, Bradlee, etc

Lighting The Fire - 18 minutes
2006 documentary about the significance of the journalism with Linda Ellerbee, Walter Cronkite, Greg Krikorian (LA Times), Jonathan Alter, senior editor of Newsweek, who believes that if Watergate happened now, due to political pressures to reveal their sources the reporters would probably have gone to jail, and the corruption of Nixon would not have been exposed. Ms. Ellerbee makes a claim I find hopelessly optimistic: 'we proved the system worked'. I have to say that I disagree strongly: it was sheer luck that Nixon was proved to be a crook. Firstly, if the Watergate buggers had been even half-competent, no link to the White House would have been discovered. Secondly, had Bob Woodward not happened to be a friend of Mark Felt, they wouldn't have been able to have developed the story, and finally, had Nixon not have had the sheer arrogance to have taped his corrupt conversations for 'posterity', the truth could still have been obscured by spin and lies.

Out Of The Shadows: The Man Who Was Deep Throat - 16 minutes
2006 documentary following the revelation that 'Deep Throat' was in fact Mark Felt, the former No. 2 at the FBI.
This documentary is marked by a right-wing author who claims that Mark Felt had numerous options available to him apart from revealing the truth about Watergate to Bob Woodward. Thankfully this nonsense is shot down by many other contributors, notably Carl Bernstein, who says 'As we saw, when other institutions fail, the press is the last resort'. Bernstein, Woodward, the Washington Post, and the world got lucky.

Pressure and The Press - 10 minutes
1970's documentary about the events and reporting.

Dinah!
1976 TV interview with Jason Robards.

I guess I'd give the second DVD here 3 1/2 stars, if that were possible. I wouldn't rush out and buy this version if you already have the single disc, however.

41人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています

John P. Jones III

A movie for January 06…

2022年1月7日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

I first watched this movie not long after it was released in 1976. What could be more compelling than watching it again, on the eve of the 6th, one of those dates that will now be one for remembrance and reflection? A presidency that had no respect for law or, even more importantly, common human decency. That drug that is more powerful and corrupting than meth: power. “You won’t have Nixon to kick around anymore, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference,” was one of his famous quotes, self-pitying, after he lost the gubernatorial race in California in 1962. He would go on to hold many more, as we know, staging a stunning political come-back. As a classic “Nixon-hater,” I’d be tossed from any potential jury… yet, in the delicious ironies of history, my ability to write this review might be solely attributed to Richard Milhous Nixon. Sure, he was not thinking of me, encased in his own motives. Weaving its way through the military bureaucracy, his decision to “Vietnamize” the war in Vietnam (a bizarre concept, even that) led to my official “withdrawal” from the war. Instead of completing the standard tour (for the Army) in Vietnam of 365 days, I only spent 357 days. Eight glorious, perhaps life-giving days. Tricky Dick, bless ’im.

From the personal to the national, the irony again, for the press did indeed, decisively, have Nixon to kick around again. Two young and hungry reporters, Carl Bernstein, played by Dustin Hoffman, and Bob Woodward, played by Robert Redford, go against the grain, even of their own newspaper, having a nose for one of the biggest stories of the 20th century, which confirm Lord Acton’s axiom about power corrupting. Jason Robards plays an excellent Ben Bradlee, the editor of the Washington Post. Tough, he is, with his “cub reporters,” but eventually he is willing to chance Katherine Graham's bosom in that old-fashioned ringer washer, one of the many threats that Bradlee received at the time, for performing his duty to himself and the American people. (She was the owner of the WP at the time.) “Run it” he would finally proclaim.

The director, Alan J. Pakula, produced a tense, fast-moving, high-charged drama that seemed to reflect journalistic standards and customs at the time: the typewriter, the crammed desks in the open office floor plan, the hustle for the scoop and meeting the deadline. And this was one of the scoops that really happened.

The fear. That is what struck me hard, yet again. The fear that we stress is more normally associated with totalitarianism: Stalin, Hitler, et al. It was SO difficult for Bernstein and Woodward to get someone to talk. Period. And for the record, virtually never. The game played by the informant, “Deep Throat,” that finally and dramatically Woodward called his hand on it. There was the fear of loss of the money for the mortgage, damage to the career… and more dramatically, the loss of life: “your lives are in danger.”

Why, oh why? If all those political operatives and their dirty-tricks gamesmanship had not appealed to Nixon’s own underhanded ways of thinking and winning elections, including the red baiting of Helen Douglas, his Democratic opponent for the Senate in 1950, he almost certainly would have won the 1972 election with “peace at hand,” He won, but ultimately lost because of the dirty tricks.

What was not in the movie, but I remember distinctly having lived through the period, was the stationing of Alexander Haig (by whom?) in the White House to prevent “unauthorized orders” being transmitted to the 82nd Airborne Division. Hum. And who determines that the Commander-in-Chief gives an unauthorized order, and how heavy are the fingerprints on the order.

The events of January 06, a year ago, confirm the truths in the cliché about history not repeating but rhyming. And since time immemorial, the loyalty (or not) of “security,” has disturbed many a leader’s sleep. An essential viewing for all who fret about the democratic process. 5-stars, plus.

13人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています

- M -

As vital and more important today as it was when first released

2019年1月3日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み

Amazonで購入

When All The President's Men was first released - it is important to note that the American psyche was still reeling from the fallout of Watergate, and the Impeachment/Resignation of Nixon.

To the best of our knowledge - no other sitting President ever so flaunted the rule of law, nor used the awesome power of the Executive Branch to wage war on his (real, or perceived) political enemies. This film captures the the story of Woodward and Bernstein - who at the time were relatively unknown young journalists, when the story was still fresh and America was coming to terms with the level of deception and criminality committed by a sitting President.

Because visual narrative styles in cinema have changed a great deal in the roughly 42+ years since the original release, there is little to initially draw a younger, modern audience into the story of two reporters who independently stumble upon some curious facts surrounding a break-in at the Watergate offices of the DNC during the 1972 Presidential Election. In time, Ben Bradlee (The Post's Executive Editor) corralled the two reporters into working together and the two eventually come to realize (to their horror) there was something much bigger, much more sinister at play. At almost every turn as they pursued their story they were blocked, stonewalled, and intimidated by forces they couldn't even fathom, yet alone reckon with. Only after doggedly pushing back with every journalistic tool at their disposal do they eventually realize that an otherwise minor crime was orchestrated at the highest levels within the White House.

So, why would anyone want to invest roughly 90 minutes of their life watching a movie from the bell-bottomed 70's about a scandal few people care about any longer? I would say mainly as a primer for young aspiring journalists on how to play their trade, but also because past is prologue when we look around and consider the corruption in the White House today. Nixon arguably got away with his criminal behavior (I say "arguably", because he had no choice but to resign as a consequence, but was never held legally accountable for his actions due to Ford's pardon), and there are consequences to that miscarriage of justice.

In the years since, Nixon advisor Roger Ailes later founded a "News" network to counter the mainstream news narrative in order to advance a partisan political narrative (and provide political cover for GOP shenanigans). Dick Cheney (himself the focus of "Vice") - who was a White House staffer under Nixon eventually became Chief of Staff under Ford, Sec'y of Defense, an finally VP under GWB. Alexander Haig, Nixon's Chief of Staff during Watergate became Sec'y of State under Reagan - a President who also endured a scandal (Iran-Contra) involving abuse of power and violation, outlined the rationale and helped craft the language for Nixon's eventual pardon.

But perhaps most important of all, it's important to note that an Attorney recommended to Joe McCarthy by J. Edgar Hoover named Roy Cohn, a man known for his ruthlessness and chicanery, served as an advisor to Nixon before, during, and after Watergate. Roy Cohn would later enter the private sector as a lawyer in NYC, representing (among others) none other than Donald J. Trump in a lawsuit alleging racial bias in violation of the Fair Housing Act (Trump settled), Roger Stone, and mob figures such as John Gotti. Cohn also introduced Trump to a newspaper man from Australia named Rupert Murdock, the man who runs FoxNews and who has provided a number of former employees (Bill Shine, John Bolton, and now Heather Nauert) who now work for Mr. Trump.

One cannot fully understand the corruption deep in the DNA of the Trump administration without understanding the story of Watergate, the players, and the political/cultural aftermath of the scandal. We should all listen attentively to those who compare Trump's criminality with Nixon's - and worry for the future of our Democracy when so many of the lessons learned from this period have been (conveniently) forgotten.

(Recommendation: Watch this film, along with "Mark Felt", and "Frost/Nixon" - then circle back to "Good night, and Good Luck" for a fuller picture of the issues, antecedent, and key players in this corrupt carnival of conservative cronies.)

13人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています